daakiwi.blogg.se

Game development sql keep all in one table or use multiple tables
Game development sql keep all in one table or use multiple tables






game development sql keep all in one table or use multiple tables game development sql keep all in one table or use multiple tables

As your data or usage grows, you might increase your instance size to keep up. In a traditional relational database, you store all items on a single node. With these solid foundations, DynamoDB is able to scale tables to petabytes of data and millions of concurrent queries. To do this, DynamoDB relies on two core mechanisms: partitioning and the B-tree. No matter the size of your database or the number of concurrent queries, DynamoDB aims to provide the same single-digit millisecond response time for all operations. Reliance on two core mechanisms for consistent scalingĪbove all else, DynamoDB wants to provide consistent performance as your application scales. With that in mind, let’s review some distinctive features of DynamoDB. Because these details are hidden, these databases can scale in unpredictable ways or make it difficult to understand what your database will cost as usage grows. These abstractions make it easier for you to query your data in flexible ways, but they also hide important details from you. Most databases provide an abstraction over the low-level bits. multi-table debate.Īs we cover these, there’s one overarching theme that ties them together: DynamoDB wants to expose reality to you, so that you can make the right decision for your application’s needs. We don’t have room to exhaustively cover everything here, but I want to hit a few points that are relevant to the single- vs. multi-table design, let’s start with some background on DynamoDB. Relevant background on DynamoDBīefore we get too far into the merits of single- vs. Finally, we’ll conclude with some instances where using multiple tables in DynamoDB might be better for you. Then, we’ll discuss when single-table design can be helpful in your application. We’ll start off with some relevant background on DynamoDB that will inform the data modeling discussion. In this post, we’ll talk about single-table design in DynamoDB. I want to look at the topic at a higher level with a specific focus on arguments both for and against single-table design. You can read the DynamoDB documentation, watch re:Invent talks or other videos, or check out my book to learn some of the design patterns with single-table design in DynamoDB. Rather than the relational notion of having a table per entity, DynamoDB tables often include multiple different entities in a single table. This is a guest post by Alex DeBrie, an AWS Hero.įor people learning about Amazon DynamoDB, the idea of single-table design is one of the most mind-bending concepts out there.








Game development sql keep all in one table or use multiple tables